the introduction is presented in such a way that "hey guys, you are programmers (i.e. you know how to program, you learned there different sorting and searching algorithms, singletons, observers and all that programmer stuff), I'll tell you how LLM works"
well I expected you to explain to me how LLM works as for SE
but when I started reading this, I got the impression that you came to an interview with the people who develop LLMs and you started proving that you know how they work for people who already know it.
You started from middle of somewhere. You started with comparing new ML with old ML and different buzzwords. But I (friendly reminder, I means software developer, not mathematic who develops LLMs) don't know about old ML. And I don't know about new ML. I came here to get explanation from you.....
the introduction is presented in such a way that "hey guys, you are programmers (i.e. you know how to program, you learned there different sorting and searching algorithms, singletons, observers and all that programmer stuff), I'll tell you how LLM works"
well I expected you to explain to me how LLM works as for SE
but when I started reading this, I got the impression that you came to an interview with the people who develop LLMs and you started proving that you know how they work for people who already know it.
You started from middle of somewhere. You started with comparing new ML with old ML and different buzzwords. But I (friendly reminder, I means software developer, not mathematic who develops LLMs) don't know about old ML. And I don't know about new ML. I came here to get explanation from you.....